Australian brand Cotton On are known and loved around the world for their fun and affordable clothing and accessories. But just how are they when it comes to their environmental impact, the treatment of their workers, and animal welfare? How ethical is Cotton On?
The Cotton On Group, which includes brands such as Rubi Shoes, Factorie, and Supré, was named the top performing retailer of 2017 in Australia. According to the Cotton On Manifesto, the company is “focused on building an ethical, sustainable and profitable business and ensuring we have a positive impact on our people, the community, the planet and all those we connect with.” But does this translate into real-world action? Let’s take a look!
Cotton On don’t publish sufficient relevant information about their environmental policies to achieve a higher rating. And we have a sneaking suspicion why! We found no evidence it reduces its carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions in its supply chain, that it has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals, OR that it minimises textile waste.
As a fast fashion brand, Cotton On produces huge quantities of cheaply made garments, most of which are made from unsustainable materials including conventional cotton, viscose, and polyester. Manufacturing these materials consumes vast amounts of energy and water, not to mention the use of hazardous chemicals. Not only do these chemicals have a detrimental effect on workers and the surrounding air, soil waterways and communities, but they have also been found to affect those who end up wearing the clothes.
As a shopper, you have the right to know how a brand’s production practices impact the environment. We strongly recommend Cotton On get their act together and publically provide information about their environmental policies. For all these reasons we rated Cotton On’s impact on environment ‘Not Good Enough’.
Cotton On also rates ‘Not Good Enough’ for labour. The brand has a Code of Conduct that covers all of the ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles and audits some of its supply chain, including all of the final stage of production.
However, we found no evidence Cotton On ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain or that it has initiatives to prevent human trafficking in its supply chain. In addition to this, the brand does not disclose any policies or safeguards to protect suppliers and workers in its supply chain from the impacts of COVID-19.
We found no evidence Cotton On has a policy to minimise the suffering of animals or that it traces any animal product to the first stage of production. And while the brand does not use fur, angora, down, exotic animal skin and hair, it still uses leather and wool. This is problematic as the welfare of leather workers and animals are unknown and therefore cannot be guaranteed. Which is why we rated Cotton On ‘Not Good Enough’ for its impact on animals.
Overall Rating: Not Good Enough
Cotton On is rated ‘Not Good Enough’ based on information from our own research. Despite their declarations of sustainability and ethical practice, Cotton On still has a long way to go before they can truly back up their claims. Though those cheap price tags can be very tempting, it’s important to remember that there’s a reason why they’re so cheap in the first place! Investing in a few, well-made pieces that will last a lifetime – or better yet, buying secondhand – are much better alternatives for the environment and your bank account.
Here are a few of our favourite eco-friendly alternatives to Cotton On, that are implementing ethical and sustainable practices when it comes making beautiful, timeless pieces.
Sustainable alternatives to Cotton On.