On the topic of international shipping and shopping sustainably, things can get complicated. If we are purchasing ethical fashion from the other side of the world, surely any positive impact gained is negated by a negative impact from carbon emissions? Well, it’s not quite that simple.
Every action has a reaction, so what choice has the least negative impact? We break it down for you below.
The journey of a piece of clothing
When understanding the impact of our individual purchases, we need to consider the entire journey the item has taken before it gets to us. Chances are, no matter how sustainable a fashion brand might be, that item of clothing has, at some point and in some form, travelled around the world. Bummer.
The standard life cycle of an item of clothing looks something like this:
As the diagram indicates, the journey is complex and lengthy. It’s extremely rare for raw materials to be grown, processed, sewn, and sold all in one location. Each stage of the supply chain has some form of impact on the environment.
When we look at shipping specifically, the impact on the environment is considerable. Ships handle roughly 90% of global trade, transporting nearly 10 billion metric tons (11 billion tons) of goods per year. It has been estimated that shipping accounts for 3 to 4 % of human-caused carbon emissions and a recent report from the European parliament estimated that number could rise as high as 17% by 2050. Yikes.
Despite this pretty major carbon impact, transport via boat is actually the cheapest and most carbon-efficient option we have right now. A big ship will emit about 10 grams (0.4 ounces) of carbon dioxide to transport 1 metric ton of cargo 1 kilometre (2 tons of cargo 1 mile). That’s roughly half as much as a train, one-fifth as much as a truck, and nearly a fiftieth (!) of what an aeroplane would emit to accomplish the same task. This last point is important—we’ll come back to it shortly.
So, what’s better? Buying ethical online, or buying ‘fast fashion’ locally?
Regardless of whether we buy a piece of clothing online or on our local high street, that item has already travelled around the world in some form, and had a considerable impact on the environment up to that point in its journey.
Due to harmful time- and cost-cutting initiatives, a high street ‘fast fashion’ item will have a considerably higher carbon footprint overall than its ethical counterpart, even if the ethical item is coming from the other side of the world.
Fast fashion is often made out of cheap synthetic fibres such as polyester, which uses fossil fuels as its base and requires a considerable amount of water and energy to produce in comparison to more sustainable options. It’s likely that the clothing has been coloured using synthetic dyes which can not only release chemicals when they come into contact with your skin (not cool), but can leak toxic waste into waterways, resulting in significant environmental and human damage.
The supply chain of a fast fashion brand is also incredibly inefficient with waste. It’s estimated that 35% of all materials will end up as waste sent to landfill. Then we must consider the carbon emissions from the shipping itself, as the item gets sent around the globe to utilise the cheapest labour at each stage of its production.
How to reduce your fashion carbon footprint
So, how can we reduce our fashion carbon footprint, even if we are already buying ethical and sustainable brands? Here are some recommendations:
Support ‘circular’ or zero-waste brands
The number one way to reduce your fashion carbon footprint when buying new is to support brands that have achieved a circular or zero-waste supply chain (where they offset all emissions and waste from their entire supply chain). They will have the lowest carbon footprint of any fashion brand. A completely circular supply chain is difficult to achieve, but there are a number of brands that are making great progress in this space. Look out for the Cradle2Cradle certification and double check the brand’s rating on the Good On You app or directory if you’re unsure.
- MUD Jeans (Great) uses a high proportion of eco-friendly materials including GOTS certified cotton and it creates high-quality, long-lasting products. It offsets carbon emissions through a valid carbon offset program. The use of eco-friendly materials limits the amount of chemicals, water and wastewater used in production.
- Reformation (Good) has been carbon neutral since 2015 through a mindful supply chain and the use of climate credits (for any greenhouse gases emitted, it pays for credits to offset its impact). The brand also offers customers the opportunity to purchase climate credits themselves when making purchases.
- Stella McCartney (Good) was the first brand to achieve a gold Cradle2Cradle certification on its wool yarn. It is also a member of the Sustainable Apparel Coalition, and uses a number of eco-friendly materials. It has ambitious waste-reduction strategies in place across the entire supply chain, and measures and reports on its direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions.
- Funky Kalakar (Good) is also working hard to achieve a circular supply-chain. They collect the old and worn-out accessories or shoes and upcycle or recycle them, to give them a new life.
Support brands who support environmental organisations
The next best thing is to support brands that donate money towards organisations that are helping to combat climate change. Look for brands that have environmental protection at the heart of their mission, and support organisations such as 1% for the planet or are B Corp certified.
- TAMGA Designs (Great) has made it their mission to fight deforestation. Through 1% for the planet, every sale donates 1% to the Sumatran Orangutan Society (S.O.S) and Orangutan Information Centre (OIC), both of which actively work to re-plant the Sumatran rainforest. The brand also uses forest-friendly, sustainable fibres in all of its clothing.
- Patagonia (Good) belongs to both the Sustainable Apparel Coalition and 1% For The Planet. It rejects fast fashion by creating high-quality, long-lasting products, and offers a repair and reuse program. It even goes so far as to discourage customers from purchasing too many of its products.
Don’t use fast shipping
Selecting the fast shipping option means that your item will be delivered to you via aeroplane instead of a cargo ship. As we mentioned earlier, transporting via aeroplane results in significantly more carbon emissions than via ship.
Use in store or centralised pick-up options
If you have the option, using these delivery options will reduce your personal carbon footprint as it will mean less courier van transport—couriers can deliver bulk deliveries to these locations instead of having to go door-to-door. Collect your items via public transport, by bike, or on foot for bonus points!
Try to reduce your consumption generally
The single best thing we can do for the planet is to keep our gear in use longer and cut down on consumption.Patagonia
Adopt a minimalist approach with a capsule wardrobe, and only purchase items that you really need, that are high-quality, and will last you a long time. Or try to find pre-loved items from your local vintage boutique. See our guide on how to build a capsule wardrobe, or how to shop vintage like a pro.
Other downsides of international shipping
Of course the environmental impact of international shipping may not be your only concern. Many counties apply import taxes, so make sure you understand the additional cost before placing that overseas order or you may be in for a nasty surprise. Returns are also a hassle, so be aware of that risk if the sizing is wrong or there is another problem with your order!