American fashion chain Urban Outfitters has made a name for itself with its on-trend and affordable clothing aimed at young adults. Affectionately referring to its customer base as ‘metropolitan hipsters’, it pulls consumers in with its carefully curated, Insta-worthy image. But are its ethics as shiny as its brand persona? How ethical is Urban Outfitters?
Owned by retail-industry giant, URBN —who also own Anthropologie and Free People—Urban Outfitters has over 200 stores across the United States Canada and Europe. However, as one of North America’s top retailers, it is easy for consumers to be swept up in the hype of the brand, rather than reflect upon its commitment to sustainability and ethical practice. So, how does Urban Outfitters rate in terms of environmental sustainability, labour rights, and animal welfare? We’ll break it down for you!
Urban Outfitters is ‘Not Good Enough’ for the environment. There is no evidence it minimises textile waste when manufacturing its products. It uses some renewable energy in its direct operations to reduce its climate impact, but no meaningful action has been taken to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals. There is also no evidence it implements water reduction initiatives. You can do better for the planet, Urban Outfitters!
Urban Outfitters is proud of its UO Community Cares initiative where employees and customers are encouraged to give back to their local community. But how much does the brand truly care about workers across its supply chain? In its response to the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act, Urban Outfitters briefly outlines some of its labour policies, including its third-party auditing processes and commitment to not use child or slave labour.
There is, however, very little evidence to support any of these claims. We’d like to know, for example, how often its factories are audited, which parts of its supply chain are audited, who its suppliers are and where they’re located!
Despite having a policy stating that Urban Outfitter does “…not knowingly carry products that use cotton originating from Uzbekistan”, in 2014 it received the lowest score possible on a survey conducted by the Responsible Sourcing Network that measured action taken by brands to ensure cotton originating from Uzbekistan was not used in its products. There is also no evidence that Urban Outfitters supplies its workers with a living wage. No stranger to controversy, in 2015 Urban Outfitters was caught up in a labour rights scandal where employees were asked to work for free over the weekend in the guise of a ‘training day’! Unsurprisingly, Urban Outfitters is also ‘Not Good Enough’ for people.
Also scoring ‘Not Good Enough’ for animals, there is no evidence Urban Outfitters has an animal welfare policy. While it does not use fur, down, angora, or exotic animal skin, it does use leather, wool, and exotic animal hair from unspecified sources. There is no evidence it traces any animal products to the first stage of production. This is problematic because the welfare of both the animals and the workers cannot be guaranteed!
Urban Outfitters is doing very little to help the environment, its workers, or our animal friends. There is no evidence that its “policies” regarding labour and transparency in the supply chain are actually undertaken.
Despite the fact that its collections are often designed to appeal to open-minded and progressive young people, Urban Outfitters has a long way to go before it can be considered a sustainable and ethical brand. As a major retailer worth billions of dollars, it could definitely do so much more to differentiate itself for the better.
Luckily, the Good On You team found a few ‘Good’ and ‘Great’ alternatives to Urban Outfitters:
Ethical alternatives to Urban Outfitters